Lagos State Governor, Mr. Babajide
Sanwo-Olu, has said that the state government is committed to
fairness, transparency, and accountability in the administration of planning
laws, maintaining that no more arbitrariness in planning approval.
Speaking on Tuesday at the inauguration
of the Lagos State Physical Planning and Building Control Appeals
Committee, Sanwo-Olu observed that every day, developers, property owners,
architects, engineers, and other construction professionals navigate the
planning approvals and regulatory decisions that shape how this state grows.
Noting that a government that regulates
without providing for review is a government that has placed itself beyond
accountability, he noted that: “For the most part, that process works. But no
system administered by human beings is infallible, and where decisions can be
wrong, there must also be a pathway for redress.
“Today, Section 79 of the Lagos State
Urban and Regional Planning and Development Law moves from text on a page into
a living institution. That institution is this Committee. And with this
inauguration, we make a clear structural commitment to fairness, transparency,
and accountability in the administration of our planning laws.
“The physical planning system in Lagos
operates through two key regulatory agencies: the Lagos State Physical Planning
Permit Authority, responsible for granting and regulating development permits;
and the Lagos State Building Control Agency, responsible for monitoring
construction activities and enforcing compliance with safety standards.
These agencies discharge essential and
often difficult responsibilities, and they do so under real pressure in one of
the world’s most demanding urban environments.
“But no regulatory system, however
well-intentioned, can be immune from error. Planning decisions involve complex
judgements, on land use, density, setbacks, structural safety, change of use,
and demolition. These decisions affect people’s investments, livelihoods, and
communities.
“It is therefore, right and necessary,
to have an independent body to which any aggrieved developer, professional,
property owner, or institution may turn when they believe a decision has been
made unfairly, incorrectly, or without due regard to their rights.
“That body is this Committee. Under
Section 82 of the Urban and Regional Planning and Development Law, this Appeals
Committee has the statutory authority to investigate and decide on matters
relating to planning permit applications, development plans and layouts,
Changes of use, approvals-in-principle,
demolition orders, the conduct of planning and building control officials, and
the service of regulatory notices. It may call for documents, summon witnesses,
and consult the full body of physical planning law and regulations in the
state. Its orders are binding, the law requires that relevant agencies enforce
them, just as they would enforce orders of the High Court.
“This is a significant mandate. I want
the members of this Committee, and the public, to understand what this means in
practice. If a developer submits a permit application and believes the refusal
was unjustified, there is now a formal, independent forum for review. If a
property owner receives a demolition notice and disputes its basis, they have
28 days in which to appeal and have that decision examined.
“If a building professional believes a
regulatory officer acted improperly, this Committee is empowered to investigate
that conduct. These are not trivial powers; they are the mechanisms through
which public confidence in our planning system is either built or eroded.
“I am also conscious that the building
safety challenge in Lagos is real and serious. The incidents of building
collapse that have claimed lives in our state and others across Nigeria are a
reminder that the purpose of building regulation is not bureaucratic formality;
it is the preservation of human life.
“This Appeals Committee must therefore
operate with a clear understanding of that context. The right to appeal a
regulatory decision is a fundamental protection, but it is not a mechanism to
circumvent safety. When the evidence supports the regulatory action of an
agency, this Committee must say so clearly and firmly.”